|
|
Cost: $300 - $900
Difficulty: |
BMW E 34 M5 "Formula 1" with
OZ 18" rims and Porsche GT2 front brakes only by movī it worldwide
|
When the Bmw E34 was produced, it was the sedan that had
the shortest braking distance. If I count the number of times
people have almost rear ended me... looks like they are not
used to it.
But because we love to race our babies too, upgrading the
brakes is something to keep in mind. The cheapest way to do
it is to use the brake components from an E32 740i or an E34
540i.
E24, E28 and E34
have identical brake fitment.
Here is info about stainless
steel brake lines.
|
Procedure from Rob Levinson
(updated by Nick) |
Try to find the calipers and brake carriers in a junk yard
and buy new rotors and pads. For any of the bigger factory
brake option, you need the correct carriers for the specific
calipers/rotors.
Front Brakes
E34
540i, E32 735i-il, 740i-il, 750il, front brakes will fit the
E34.
E32 front brakes are an upgrade for non M5/M540i, but the
real front upgrades are the E31 and E34 M5. 324mm needs 16"wheels
and 345mm fits under 17" wheels. Everything in the table
will fit:
|
Bmw Model
|
Rotor size
|
Rotor part#
|
Caliper part# L/R
|
Clip part#
|
Carrier
|
E32 730i (L6&V8)
E34 525i-535i-530i |
V 302 x 22
|
34 11 1 160
936
|
34 11 1 160
367/368
|
34 11 1 157
687
|
34 11 1 160
366
|
E32 735i/il L6
E32 740i/il-750i/il
E34 540i |
V 302 x 28
|
34 11 6 756 090
|
34 11 1 160 363/364
|
34 11 1 157 687
|
34 11 1 160 365
|
E34 M5 3.6 |
V 315 x 28
|
34 11 2 226 385
|
34 11 2 226 873/874
|
34 11 1 157
687
|
34 11 2 226
875
|
E31 840/850Csi** |
V 324 x 30
|
34 11 1 159
895
|
34 11 1 160
325/326
|
34 11 1 159
957
|
34 11 1 160
327
|
E31 840/850*** |
V 324 x 30
|
34 11 6 756 087
34 11 1 161 086
|
34 11 1 16 177/178
|
none
|
4 piston callipers
|
E38 750il |
V 334 x 32
|
34 11 6 757 756
|
does not fit
|
does not fit
|
does not fit
|
E34 M5 3.8 ('95) |
V 345 x 32
|
34 11 2 227 735/736
|
34 11 2 227 115/116*
|
34 11 2 227 506
|
Requires 17" wheels
|
* 4 piston calipers, integral carrier
V: ventilated
** 93-95 for the US 850Csi and up to 08/93 for other US models.
***840 - 850 from 08/93 on |
The larger Euro
M5 brakes came standard on the Canadian model M540i.
They weren't included on the U.S. 540i Sport model for litigious
reasons, i.e. the aluminum floating rotor that requires periodic
inspection for cracking. It was deemed US owners would ignore
that service and end up maiming themselves and suing BMW.
(Thanks David)
|
Rear Brakes
(updated thanks to Gregory B. and Nick)
735il rear brakes
will not fit the E34. E32 rear rotors will not
fit the E34. However the 750i/il, 740i/il (and 540i) calipers
and carriers can be bolted on the E34 when used with 540i
rotors.
No E31 rear callipers fits the E34 but the 324x12 non vented
rotor will fit. Everything
in the table will fit:
|
Bmw Model
|
Rotor size
|
Rotor part#
|
Caliper part# L/R
|
Clip part#
|
Carrier
|
E34 525-535-530 |
300 x 10
|
34 21 1 162
305
|
34 11 1 160
381/382
|
34 11 1 157
046
|
34 11 1 160
383
|
E34 540i |
V 300 x 20
|
34 21 1 159
659
|
34 21 1 160
399/400
|
34 21 1 157
046
|
34 11 1 160
384
|
E32 730i/il
L6 & V8 |
300 x 10
|
34 21 1 165 259
does not fit
|
34 21 1 160 381/382
|
34 21 1 157 046
|
34 21 1 160 383
|
E32 735i/il &
some L6 730i/il |
300 x 12
|
34 21 1 165 257
not tested
|
34 21 1 160 353/354
not tested
|
34 21 1 157 046
|
34 21 1 160 355
not tested
|
E32 740i/il
E32 750i/il from 1/90
|
V 300 x 20
|
34 21 1 162 967
does not fit
|
34 21 1 160
399/400
|
34 21 1 157
046
|
34 11 1 160
384
|
E32 750i/il
to 1/90
|
V 300 x
20
|
34 21 1 162 967
does not fit
|
34 21 1 160
385/386
|
34 21 1 157
046
|
34 11 1 160
384
|
E34 M5 3.6 |
V 300 x 20
|
34 21 1 159 659
|
34 21 1 160 399/400
|
34 21 1 157 046
|
34 11 1 160 384
|
E34 M5 3.8 ('95) |
V 328 x 20
|
34 21 2 227 844
34 21 1 160 233
|
34 21 2 227 873/874
|
34 21 2 227 672
|
34 21 2 227 875
|
V: ventilated
E39 M5 brakes definitively do NOT fit the E34. Rob tried
a set last summer, BMW moved the carrier mounting holes about
2mm further apart. The rotors also do not have the dual 18mm
posts required to fit the E34 M5 hubs.
Cross drilled rotors are a waste of money, if you want to
use your E34 on the track you can consider the ATE slotted
rotors. If you want the ultimate in braking and have 17" wheels,
consider upgrading to the Mov'it/Porsche kit. Check ultimate
garage.
|
Brake balance: front/rear: |
The type of brakes you install on your car has a large influence
on how the car feels and handles, especially when driven hard.
BMWs with semi-trailing-arm rear suspension tend to have some
squat under acceleration and a certain amount of dive under
hard braking.
For example, certain choices of front or rear brakes will
increase the front brake bias over stock, which will obviously
exacerbate the brake dive problem--not a good thing! Changing
the bias will also affect the car's susceptibility to having
the ABS kick in prematurely on the front or rear axle. Finally,
it affects pedal travel--a lower-torque brake setup will require
more pedal travel for the same amount of braking force compared
to another setup. Even if you change the front and rear brakes
simultaneously and maintain something close to the stock bias,
if the new brakes are lower torque than the stock brakes you'll
end up with more pedal travel. With some cars this can even
mean having to change the master cylinder to a higher-volume
unit.
To give an example, the E34 540i brakes develop 686 lb-ft
of torque on the fronts at 500 psi line pressure; the rears
produce 313 LB-ft, so the f:r bias is 69:31 (as a percentage).
Adding the M5 front brake (rears are the same on US E34 M5's),
which generates 720 LB-ft, changes the bias to 70:30. The
'95 Euro M5 brakes generate 646 LB-ft front and 336 LB-ft
rear, giving a bias of 66:34. Everyone raves about this setup,
which is interesting as the front brakes actually generate
LESS torque than the earlier E34 M5 (or the 540i, for that
matter)! Chances are that this perception of awesome brakes
has more to do with the better balance front-to-rear than
the massive cooling capability, which only comes into play
when you're driving the piss out of the car and the brakes
are generating many kilowatts of heat. Unless you go to the
track, you'll never encounter that aspect of their performance.
Here's where it gets interesting: the 850i single-piston
front brake (like I have) generates 737 LB-ft, the highest
of any BMW brake I know of. I assume you put the 540i rears
(313 LB-ft) on your car, so the bias is 70:30, same as the
US E34 M5. However, if you instead use the later 840i/850i
(not CSi) brakes, which generate only 593 LB-ft of torque,
the bias would be 65:35--very close to the Euro '95 M5 brakes.
I believe, though haven't proven it yet, that this might be
the ideal setup for the majority of E34 owners who don't want
to spend the huge bucks for the '95 M5 brakes. It's still
not cheap, but it's half the price of the alternative.
|
Other 4 piston calipers non OEM brakes:
Bmwsnail emailed me saying: I am running the fronts off a
Porsche 928S4, they were also fitted to the fronts of the
944 Turbo S. They needed a bracket fabricated to get them
to work. Have had some warping issues with the 850i rotors
in the past but the latest set appear to be holding up ok.
The price of the 928S4 callipers is pretty high as this is
a popular upgrade for Porsches. I am working on a similar
upgrade for my 635csi race car, using Wilwood calipers, if
I am happy with the result I will sell the brackets and you
will be able to buy your choice of wilwood calipers.
|
Street Pads |
Raybestos pgplus:
Improvement over stock, stop well , quiet, no dust... Much
better than the metal master pads.
PBR - Repco - Axis Deluxe:
Good pads for non aggressive street driving. Low dust. Might
squeal a little. Not suited for extreme or track use.
EBC GreenStuff:
Kevlar compound pads for non aggressive street driving. Low
dust.
|
Street Pads, may be used on track |
Stock Pads:
Fine on street, decent on track. Dusty pads. Can overheat
by a strong intermediate or advance driver.
Raybestos QS series which is the ceramic:
Improvement over stock, stop well , quiet, no dust.... but
the QS ceramic raybestos seems to be a big step better than
the pgplus.
PBR - Repco - Axis MetalMasters or EBC RedStuff:
Average pads for aggressive street driving, after little warm
up. Low dust. Tend to squeal. Better choice than the Deluxes
on track.
PBR - Repco - Axis Ceramic
New compound yet to be tested
Pagip:
German sport pads for street use. Exact fit. Dusty pads. Work
better than stock on track.
Performance Friction Z-rated:
Good street/track pad. Better bite and less dust than stock.
Needs little warm up.
Performance R4S:
Carbon Kevlar street/track pad. Impressive bite and heat resistance.
No warm up needed.
Carbotech Panther:
Street/track pad. Good bite, resistance to fade, quiet.
|
Track Pads (not suited for street use) |
Porterfield R4 or EBC YellowStuff:
Carbon Kevlar pad. Great bite, fade resistant. Squeal a bit
under light braking.
Performance Friction 90:
Racing brake pad used in GT2, GT3 racing. Great braking power
and fade resistance. Last's long.
Hawk HT10:
Strong braking, heat resistance, noisy and dusty. Warm up
needed for max efficiency.
Be sure to change the brake fluid annually using BMW Brake
fluid or ATE SL Dot 4. Racing fluid like ATE Super Blue or
AP racing 5.1 and 600 (available at Raven) are designed to
be used in extreme track conditions, but tends to be more
hygroscopic than the street brake fluid.
|
(Thanks to Rob, Jay Sala, Phil Coppin, Dave
W., Rodney M., Nick)
|
|
|
|